I, me and Solid State Drives
September 20th, 2009 | by Sajal Kayan |Let me first explain my set-up before the upgrade. I use 2 computers, 1 desktop at office and a laptop at home or while traveling.
Laptop : Lenovo; core 2; 2 GB RAM; regular 5.4k rpm hard disk. Purchased abt 1.5 years ago.
Desktop : (costed same as laptop but purchased only 3 or 4 months ago) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz ; 6 GB DDR3 ; a kickass motherboard; 1TB Seagate HDD (ST31000528AS) - 7.2k rpm
After using the Desktop for most of the work, I was no more able to work from the Laptop which was significantly slower than the desktop. Having used Solid State Drive (SSD) on my server for few months as Mysql data directory, I decided to see how it could improve things on the laptop.
Over the last few months, I had saved enough to treat myself to some gadgets

On reaching Fortune mall, I couldn’t find SSDs anywhere, no store there had heard of “Solid State Disk” or “SSD”. In fact one shopkeeper thought I wanted to buy SD cards. I only upgraded the memory to 4 GB. After this upgrade, things didn’t speed up much, just that it didn’t lag anymore after opening loads of applications.
I had lost all hope… and even started thinking in what other way to spend my gadget budget when Twitter came to the rescue in the form of a reply from my fav columnist which said “@sajal at fortune jet has some, but for components, zeer is better these days i feel. It swings.” .
Getting my hopes up.. I went to that shop, they had options between Intel X25-M(MLC) and few OCI brands. Since I don’t care about diskspace, I was actually looking for X25-E(SLC) which is in my server, but they hadn’t heard of it here in Bangkok, so I settled for a 80 GB X25-M costing me 13,500 Baht (approx 400 USD). Decision to go for Intel was highly influenced by AnandTech’s reviews. AnandTech has series of articles and benchmarks on SSD performance and benchmarks for various applications. (Dear AnandTech : Will you give me a job? All i need is a chance to play with cool things
)
Disadvantages of using SSD in laptop:-
- Unlike before, now you can’t feel the vibration, noise from the drive, hence you don’t “feel” when your disk is being accessed or is it idling.
- The disk activity LED hardly lights up… SSDs idle much more than regular disk since the requested data is returned immediately, thus the transaction is completed before the LED can light up fully.
- The laptop(running Ubuntu 9.04) boots up in < 20 seconds including me logging in. This doesnt give me enough time to get coffee, pee, etc after reaching home and pushing the on switch.
- It is slightly thinner than a regular 2.5″ notebook HDD, hence it is placed in my laptop at a very slight angle. Maybe later i should put in a metal sheet or something to compensate.
Now, the performance of my laptop is in fact slightly better than the desktop. I am looking forward to the day when SSDs get more commoditized and we start seeing them compete with regular HDD in terms of cost per GB. - If i had the kind of money, id load up 10 64 GB Intel X25-Es in my main desktop
My conclusion is that the main bottleneck in laptops is Disk I/O. I guess within a year or sooner, we will see most mid-segment laptops coming with SSDs instead of currently HDD.
Sphere: Related Content




2 Responses to “I, me and Solid State Drives”
By todd on Oct 6, 2009 | Reply
my main desktop is a quad core amd phenom 9750, 8gb ram 2x 1tb drives in raid 0 for speed, 2x nvidia 8600’s with 4x 19″ monitors…
I used to run a 16gb ssd as my primary drive but it ended up failing to an extent - ssd’s have a tenancy to acquire bad sectors easily, my first ssd had a few after a couple of months usage, the ssd has addition memory built in to handle x% of failure, but the auto-recovery process brings the drive to a halt almost, barely usable.
I bought a 2nd 32gb ssd, different brand and again after a few months it ended up with bad memory, it recovered itself with the additional memory on the drive but again it grids to an almost halt for hours and hours.
I’ve given up on them and have stuck with my raid 0 array.
I’ll go back to ssd’s when they are bigger (250gb), cheaper ($1 per gb) and more reliable…
I was considering using SSD’s in one of my dell pe 1950 servers but with the level of unreliability I’ve had it’s not worth it.
By Sajal Kayan on Nov 6, 2009 | Reply
@todd : Give the Intels a try theyre awesome.
Ive been using X25-E on server for quite a while… no regrets only much better speed.
Its likely that when you bought your SSD then the segment wasnt as mature as it is now.
This review will change yr mind : http://techreport.com/articles.x/15433